Sunday, December 20, 2009

Darwin's Struggle: The Evolution of the Origin of Species



Darwin unleashed a new vision of nature where species evolved independently from guiding hand of a creator. Harmonious world of mankind created by God was shattered. This was a challenge against traditional beliefs and a struggle in Darwin's personal life. The BBC Four documentary tells this struggle with beautiful imagery and dramatic scenes, benefiting from Darwin's secret notes and letters. Broadcasted on 02 February.

Related to: Charles Darwin: Evolution's Voice


File Name ..........: Darwins.Struggle.2009.BBC.Four.avi
Total Size (MB) ....: 559,03 MB
Video Length .......: 00:59:13
Video Codec Code ...: XVID
Video Codec Name ...: XviD MPEG-4 codec
Resolution .........: 624 x 352
Audio Bitrate ......: 128 KB/s (CBR)
Channels ...........: 2 Ch
Sampling Rate ......: 48000 Hz

Download:

http://rapidshare.com/files/200839679/Darwins.Struggle.2009.BBC.Four.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/200839725/Darwins.Struggle.2009.BBC.Four.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/200821597/Darwins.Struggle.2009.BBC.Four.part3.rar


Share this post :
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Delicious
Share on Reddit
Share on Digg
Share on simpy
Share on Technorati
furl Share on furl
Feeds RSS Subscribe to Feeds RSS

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Creationism (or intelligent design) is nt scientific, coz it requires scientists 2 stop investigating as soon as dey r stumped. Scientists cannot validly maintain tt just coz dey cannot understd something, it intrinsically cannot be understood, just as dey cannot say tt coz dey cannot test d existence of something, it cannot exist.

Take an example, tt v r talking abt fish in an aquarium. If u hv had an aquarium, u knw tt some fish feed at d surface, othrs feed at d bottom, n still othrs feed in d middle. The fish who feed in d middle or at d bottom do nt believe in the aquarist, coz dey hv never seen him, n coz dey can explain everything tt happens in the aquarium as a natural process. One day, 1 of d small surface-feeding fish gets sucked up into d filter. The aquarist rescues him, puts him back in d water, den walks away 2 do other things. The small fish excitedly goes around telling all d other fish tt der is an intelligent creature who set up d aquarium, maintains it, n drops der food into d water. The other fish ask him 2 prove d existence of d aquarist, but he cannot. No matter how hard he looks or where he searches, he cannot find d aquarist in d aquarium. The skeptical fish all go 2 d surface 2 look, but dey don’t see any1 der.

So who is right? The scientific fish who hv deduced d natural processes tt occur within d aquarium, or d little fish who claims 2 hv experienced d aquarist? Both r right, but both hv incomplete knowledge.

Post a Comment